- Air Force Dental Technician Manual >>>CLICK HERECD (2005) Vol. Incorporated into manual dexterity test for dental technician. Washington Harris Group - MT - Malmstrom Air Force Base - posted 17 days ago.
- Development and Standardization of a 'Do-Eat' Activity of Daily Living Performance Test for Children. Their manual dexterity, ball skills. Childre n with D CD is re presented by a wide.
- Carpentry Training Manual Cd Read/Download Carpenter Apprenticeship is an obvious choice for those who are good at working with Modern carpentry demands both manual skill and the ability to read. University of North Florida, Carpenter Library, Thomas G. Carpenter Library, Jacksonville, FL 32224 Training Manual and Power Point Training CD Included.
Abstract
Aim: The Scratch programming language allows learner developers to write games. The Kinect2Scratch extension makes Scratch games with bodily motion control possible by connecting to Microsoft's Kinect sensor. This study examined the feasibility and possible efficacy of a suite of motion-controlled games designed for upper extremity (UE) training in children with cerebral palsy (CP) using Kinect2Scratch.
Materials and Methods: This is a proof-of-concept study. We developed three games, requiring three UE movement patterns (shoulder holding, reaching, and handclap), for use in children with CP. The primary outcome was feasibility, addressed by adherence, engagement, satisfaction, and safety. The secondary outcome was efficacy, which was evaluated by Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST), Box and Block Test (BBT), Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) test, and ABILHAND-kids score.
Results: Thirteen children with CP (mean age 6.9 years) received 24 sessions of training (30 minutes per session). The adherence rate was 100%. During the first 2 weeks of training, children had a significantly higher level of participation in Kinect2Scratch training than in conventional rehabilitation [Pittsburgh Participation Scale, median (interquartile range [IQR]), 6 (3â6) vs. 4 (3â6) Pâ=â0.04]. However, during the last 2 weeks of training, there was no significant difference in participation between the Kinect2Scratch and conventional training [Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale, median (IQR), 4 (3â5) vs. 4 (3â6) Pâ=â0.55]. Most children enjoyed playing the games. The mean score of enjoyment was 4.54â±â0.66. There were no adverse events during the training periods. The children had significant improvement in total score of QUEST and MA2. There were no significant improvements in BBT and ABILHAND-kids score.
Conclusion: Using Kinect2Scratch games for UE training is a feasible adjunctive program for children with CP.
Introduction
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of physical disability in childhood with more than 2 cases per 1000 live births.1 Children with CP usually have various functional impairments of their upper extremities (UEs), which might reduce their independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Function training for the UEs is an important issue in CP rehabilitation.
Current evidence supports that goal-directed, task-specific, and high-dose repetition therapy could lead to better motor outcomes.2â7 However, the intensive repetitive training has been a challenging task for pediatric rehabilitation, because such therapy may be boring, nonmotivational, and can generate a habituation process that limits the motor learning.8,9 There is a growing interest in finding therapeutic approaches, which provide a means of repetition and are highly motivating. Exercise-based computer games can facilitate high-volume complex task practice, enhance feedback of movement, and increase motivation of participants.10 Some bespoke systems and off-the-shelf commercial entertainment applications have emerged as new treatment approaches in rehabilitation training. Nevertheless, the cost and the requirement for special technical support of these systems limit the availability for most patients. Off-the-shelf commercial games are more affordable; however, those games are not specifically designed for therapeutic use and can be too difficult for children with physical and cognitive impairments.11,12 There is a need for feasible, effective, and low-cost, motion-controlled computer games for UE rehabilitation in children with CP.
The Microsoft Kinect⢠is an infrared camera-based sensor a player can use to play a game through bodily movement without the need for handheld controllers. Moreover, the Kinect is inexpensive, portable, and simple to set up. The original Kinect design only identified joint displacement by measuring physical distance between joints. The distance can be very different for different individuals; it needs calibration when users change. Chang et al.13 made the Kinect design more robust by using angles instead of displacements of joints.
MIT's Scratch14 is widely used by learner developers to write games. Typically, Scratch games were controlled by a computer mouse or keyboard. A Scratch extension is a separate program that extends Scratch's capabilities, usually by connecting to external hardware devices. Howell developed Kinect2Scratch,15 which allows body tracking data from the Kinect be sent to Scratch. By using Kinect2Scratch, players can control Scratch games by moving their extremities.
The aims of this study were to (1) develop a suite of motion-controlled Kinect2Scratch games for UE training in children with CP and (2) investigate the feasibility and possible effects of these games. We hypothesized that the motion-controlled Kinect2Scratch games are feasible and effective for UE training in children with CP.
Materials and Methods
Game design
Considering the common problems of UE function in children with CP, and the motions that the Kinect sensor can detect, we chose two unilateral and one bilateral UE motion patterns (shoulder holding, reaching, and clapping hands) to play the games. The shoulder holding is the fundamental component of any UE movement. Reaching is a very common UE movement in ADL. Clapping hands is a bilateral coordinated movement. Three sample games (Table 1), âHungry Shark,â âAlien Attack,â and âHungry Ant,â developed by Howell, were chosen as the base game design. In âHungry Shark,â the children needed to use their more affected UE in an âup and downâ motion to control the shark. In âHungry Ant,â the children used multidirectional reaching motion to control an ant. In âAlien Attack,â the children clapped their hands (using bilateral shoulder abductionâadduction motion) to launch missiles at the aliens.
Table 1.Characteristics of a Videogame for Health: (Kinect2Scratch Games)
Hungry Shark | Hungry Ant | Alien Attack | |
---|---|---|---|
Health topic(s) | Developing a suite of motion-controlled games for upper extremities training in children with cerebral palsy | Developing a suite of motion-controlled games for upper extremities training in children with cerebral palsy | Developing a suite of motion-controlled games for upper extremities training in children with cerebral palsy |
Targeted age group(s) | Age between 5 and 15 years | Age between 5 and 15 years | Age between 5 and 15 years |
Other targeted group characteristics | Clinical diagnosis of CP, involving at least one UE, manual ability graded as Manual Ability Classification System levels IâIV; had sufficient cognitive ability to play simple computer games; and vision sufficient to view the TV screen | Clinical diagnosis of CP, involving at least one UE, manual ability graded as Manual Ability Classification System levels IâIV; had sufficient cognitive ability to play simple computer games; and vision sufficient to view the TV screen | Clinical diagnosis of CP, involving at least one UE, manual ability graded as Manual Ability Classification System levels IâIV; had sufficient cognitive ability to play simple computer games; and vision sufficient to view the TV screen |
Short description of game idea | Low cost, easily set up, user friendly, with therapeutic idea, motion-controlled games for UE training in children with CP | Low cost, easily set up, user friendly, with therapeutic idea, motion-controlled games for UE training in children with CP | Low cost, easily set up, user friendly, with therapeutic idea, motion-controlled games for UE training in children with CP |
Target player(s) | Individual | Individual | Individual |
Guiding knowledge or behavior change theory(ies), models, or conceptual framework(s) | Goal-directed, task-specific, and high-dose repetition therapy could lead to better motor outcomes. Exercise-based computer games can facilitate high-volume complex task practice, enhance feedback of movement, and increase motivation of participants | Goal-directed, task-specific, and high-dose repetition therapy could lead to better motor outcomes. Exercise-based computer games can facilitate high-volume complex task practice, enhance feedback of movement, and increase motivation of participants | Goal-directed, task-specific, and high-dose repetition therapy could lead to better motor outcomes. Exercise-based computer games can facilitate high-volume complex task practice, enhance feedback of movement, and increase motivation of participants |
Intended health behavior changes | Improve UE function | Improve UE function | Improve UE function |
Knowledge element(s) to be learned | The Kinect2Scratch videogames therapy is feasible and well accepted by children with CP These games could be a complementary strategy to conventional therapy | The Kinect2Scratch videogames therapy is feasible and well accepted by children with CP These games could be a complementary strategy to conventional therapy | The Kinect2Scratch videogames therapy is feasible and well accepted by children with CP These games could be a complementary strategy to conventional therapy |
Behavior change procedure(s) (taken from Michie inventory) or therapeutic procedure(s) used | Functional repetitive movements in virtual environments are one of the principal mechanisms to favor the cortical reorganization and to eliciting neuroplastic changes in children with CP, videogames increasing the motivation of the player | Functional repetitive movements in virtual environments are one of the principal mechanisms to favor the cortical reorganization and to eliciting neuroplastic changes in children with CP, videogames increasing the motivation of the player | Functional repetitive movements in virtual environments are one of the principal mechanisms to favor the cortical reorganization and to eliciting neuroplastic changes in children with CP, videogames increasing the motivation of the player |
Clinical or parental support needed? (please specify) | A supervised therapist or parents are needed to set up the system and instruct the children how to play the games and correct the inappropriate movement of children during the training sessions They also need to adjust the levels of difficulty throughout the training period by modifying target speed, movement accuracy, repetitions, and/or task complexity according to the performance of children | A supervised therapist or parents are needed to set up the system and instruct the children how to play the games and correct the inappropriate movement of children during the training sessions They also need to adjust the levels of difficulty throughout the training period by modifying target speed, movement accuracy, repetitions, and/or task complexity according to the performance of children | A supervised therapist or parents are needed to set up the system and instruct the children how to play the games and correct the inappropriate movement of children during the training sessions They also need to adjust the levels of difficulty throughout the training period by modifying target speed, movement accuracy, repetitions, and/or task complexity according to the performance of children |
Data shared with parent or clinician | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Type of game: (check all that apply) | Active, action | Active, action | Active, action |
Story (if any) | None | None | None |
Synopsis (including story arc) | None | None | None |
How the story relates to targeted behavior change | None | None | None |
Game components | |||
âPlayer's game goal/objective(s) | Score on the screen/the shark eats the small fishes | Score on the screen/ant eats the number | Score on the screen/missile hits the alien |
âRules | Increase score if the shark eats the small fishes | Increase score if the ant eats the number | Increase score if the missile hits the alien |
âGame mechanic(s) | The children need to use their more affected UE in an âup and downâ motion to control the shark's movement to eat the coming fishes | The children used multidirectional reaching motion to control an ant to eat the numbers on the screen | The children did handclap (bilateral shoulder abductionâadduction) to launch missiles at the aliens |
âProcedures to generalize or transfer what's learned in the game to outside the game | Increasing shoulder holding ability, proximal stability, muscle power of shoulder and elbow, eyeâhand coordination, reaction time, helping to use affected UE for reaching, holding in ADL | Increasing shoulder multidirectional movement, muscle power of shoulder and elbow, eyeâhand coordination, reaction time, helping to use affected UE for reaching in ADL | Increasing bilateral coordination, eyeâhand coordination, reaction time, shoulder holding, muscle power of bilateral shoulders and elbows, improving bilateral UE use in ADL |
Virtual environment | |||
âSetting (describe) | A TV screen, a Kinect, and a computer | A TV screen, a Kinect, and a computer | A TV screen, a Kinect, and a computer |
Avatar | |||
âCharacteristics | There is no actual avatar, just a shark can be controlled | There is no actual avatar, just an ant can be controlled | There is no actual avatar, just missiles can be controlled |
âAbilities | A player used his or her more affected UE in an âup and downâ motion to control the shark to eat the small fish | A player used multidirectional motion to control an ant to eat the number on the screen | A player needed to handclap (bilateral shoulder abductionâadduction) to launch missiles at the aliens |
âGame platform(s) needed to play the game | Kinect for Windows sensory device, a computer installed with Scratch visual programming language platform and Kinect2Scratch software | Kinect for Windows sensory device, a computer installed with Scratch visual programming language platform and Kinect2Scratch software | Kinect for Windows sensory device, a computer installed with Scratch visual programming language platform and Kinect2Scratch software |
âSensors used | Kinect for Windows | Kinect for Windows | Kinect for Windows |
âEstimated play time | 8 minutes | 8 minutes | 8 minutes |
ADL, activities of daily living; CP, cerebral palsy; UE, upper extremity.
When playing the games, the children were asked to keep their elbows extended and trunk at midline. We used audio and text cues to prevent the children using inappropriate strategies, such as trunk deviation or elbow flexion, to play games. The acceptable range of trunk and UE movement was determined by therapists and stored in the games. If players exceeded the range, the game supplied an on-screen text reminder and audio prompt.
Participants
Harris Cd Link Stl Manual Dexterity Test
We recruited children who received rehabilitation training in a tertiary hospital, had clinical diagnosis of CP, involving at least one UE, aged between 5 and 15 years, manual ability graded as Manual Ability Classification System levels IâIV; had sufficient cognitive ability to play simple computer games; and vision sufficient to view the TV screen to join this study. Children who had severe comorbidities, incapacity to sit even with an external support, surgical intervention in the year before study onset, botulinum injections in the 6 months before study onset, and noncontrolled epilepsy, were excluded.
The Ethics Committee of the CGMH approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all participating children before being recruited to the study.
Interventions
Each game play took 8 minutes, with a 2-minute break between every two games. The number of movements that the player made was not controlled. We suggested children complete 24 sessions for 12 weeks. Children sat or stood, depending on their ability, and this was kept constant across sessions.
A supervised occupational therapist instructed the children how to play the games and corrected the inappropriate movement of the children verbally or with manual guidance if the text or audio reminder did not work. The therapist adjusted the levels of difficulty of the games by modifying target speed, movement accuracy, repetitions, and/or task complexity according to the performance of the child. The therapist could also change the avatars in the games according to the child's preferences. For example, most children did not like the ant, it was replaced by a car.
Because our Kinect2Scratch games only focused on proximal UE motion training, we provided additional 30 minutes of conventional occupation therapy, focusing on hand function training, at each training session. The conventional occupational therapy was administered by another therapist. Treatment orders of Kinect2Scratch games and conventional occupation therapy were randomized.
Outcome measures
This was a proof-of-concept feasibility study. Feasibility of Kinect2Scratch gaming training was the primary outcome of interest, including adherence, engagement, satisfaction, and safety.16,17 We also recorded the technical problems of delivery with the Kinect2Scratch games.
Adherence was represented by session attendance. We used the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS)18 to assess the average degree of children's engagement in the first and last 2 weeks of either Kinect-based or conventional training according to the training records of the therapists. This assessment is a six-point scale of observed treatment engagement (effort and motivation). The PRPS had high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]â=â0.91 for occupational therapists, ICCâ=â0.96 for physical therapists).18 Satisfaction was evaluated at the end of the 12-week intervention. Children used 5-point Likert scales to rate the enjoyment of the Kinect2Scratch games training from âstrongly not enjoyedâ (1) to âstrongly enjoyedâ (5) and ranked the three games according to their preference. For children who did not understand the meaning of 5-point Likert scales, we used the bar chart to help the description of the 5-point Likert scales. The caregivers were interviewed to ask about the change of the children's UE function, children's motivation, and the general comments. About safety, we recorded any adverse events within the treatment sessions and during the study period.
Possible efficacy of Kinect2Scratch games was the secondary outcome of interest and was assessed at the beginning (T0) and after 24 sessions of training (T1) of the treatment. We used Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST)19,20 to assess the change of body function of the participants. Activity level was assessed by using the Box and Block Test (BBT),21 Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2),22 and ABILHAND-kids score.23
Harris Cd Link Stl Manual Dexterity Activities
QUEST evaluates four domains: upper limb dissociated movements, grasp function, protective upper limb extension, and weight bearing. The total score and each domain score were used for further analysis.
The BBT is a reliable and valid assessment tool of hand function.21,24 Children were asked to grasp small wooden cubes and move them from one side of the box to the other as fast as possible within 60 seconds.
The MA2 is a tool for evaluating quality of unilateral upper limb movement (movement range, accuracy, dexterity, and fluency) in children with neurological conditions aged from 2.5 to 15 years. It comprises 14 test items of reaching to, grasping, releasing, and manipulating simple objects.22,25
The QUEST and MA2 were recorded by video for scoring, scorers were blinded to the group allocation and the time point of assessments.
The ABILHAND-kids is a Rasch-derived, parent-completed questionnaire of 21 unilateral and bilateral activities. Each item is graded as easy, difficult, or impossible for the child to achieve.26,27
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 12.0 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics and feasibility data. We used the ShapiroâWilk test to assess the normality of data distribution. Non-normally distributed data reported as median and interquartile range (IQR), and normally distributed data reported as meanâ±âSD in the text. Within-subject comparisons were examined using paired t-test for normally distributed data and with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normally distributed data. All significant tests were two tailed and differences were considered to be statistically significant at a P-value <0.05. Because this was a proof-of-concept study, no corrections for multiple testing were done.
Results
Seventeen children with CP were screened for eligibility. Three patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, one changed her conventional rehabilitation training to another clinic, and thus, thirteen patients were included in the study. The mean age of participants was 6.9â±â2.72 years, 6 (46.2%) with hemiplegia, 5 (38.5%) with diplegia, and 5 (38.5%) with Manual Ability Classification System level IâII (Table 2).
Table 2.Basic Characteristics of Participants (Nâ=â13)
Characteristics | |
Age, years | 6.90â±â2.72 |
Gender, boy | 6 (46.2%) |
Training side, right | 9 (69.2%) |
Education | |
âPreschool | 7 (53.8%) |
âPrimary school | 6 (46.2%) |
Type | |
âHemiplegia | 6 (46.2%) |
âDiplegia | 5 (38.5%) |
âQuadriplegia | 2 (15.4%) |
MACS | |
âIâII | 5 (38.5%) |
âIIIâVI | 8 (61.5%) |
GMFCS | |
âIâII | 7 (53.8%) |
âIIIâV | 6 (46.2%) |
GMFCS, Gross Motor Function Classification System; MACS, Manual Ability Classification System.
Adherence
All children completed the 24 sessions of intervention. However, after 10â12 sessions of training, there were five children whose motivation in games training faded gradually. We needed to encourage them to complete the training during the late training course.
Engagement
At the first 2 weeks of training, seven children had excellent, one very good, one good, three fair, and one poor participation in Kinect-based training. Two children had excellent, two very good, four good, and five fair participation in conventional rehabilitation. Children had a significantly higher level of participation in Kinect training than in conventional rehabilitation sessions [6 (3â6) vs. 4 (3â6) Pâ=â0.04]. At the last 2 weeks of training, five children decreased their participation level from excellent to good or even fair in Kinect training, while two children raised their participation level from fair to good in Kinect training. The participation level in conventional rehabilitation was constant. There was no significant difference in participation between Kinect and conventional training sessions in late intervention course [4 (3â5) vs. 4 (3â6) Pâ=â0.55].
Satisfaction
In general, children and parents were satisfied with the system. Four (30.77%) children enjoyed, eight (61.54%) strongly enjoyed the games training, and the mean score of enjoyment was 4.54â±â0.66. The children preferred the âAlien Attackâ game most, followed by âHungry Antâ game. The children complained that the motion to play the Hungry Shark game was difficult.
Parents reported that after intervention their child used the affected UE more frequently, could carry heavier objects, and had better quality of UE movement compared with the performance before intervention. Five parents reported that their child showed great enthusiasm in games at early stage of training, but the enjoyment of playing declined gradually. The possible reasons were (1) few games available, (2) little variation and lower quality of the graphics compared with commercial games, (3) lack of peer competition or rewards, and (4) the motor demands for gameplay were difficult for their child.
Safety
No major adverse events occurred. Nine children complained of mild shoulder soreness at an early stage of intervention. Such soreness did not disrupt their training. After several sessions of intervention, those complaints subsided spontaneously.
Technical problem
In general, the accuracy of motion detection of Kinect is acceptable, but we still experienced some technical joint tracking issues. The Kinect tracking algorithms work best with standing participants, and when all limbs are visible to the camera sensor. If a limb is partially occluded (e.g., an arm is hidden behind the subject's back), then the Kinect cannot determine the accurate position of the limb and will only track the visible limbs with a high degree of confidence. As some of the subjects were seated in the study, the Kinect may not track the hip and leg positions with accuracy.
The detection problem occurred most common with short stature children (the shortest child in our study was 95âcm tall) with poor seated positioning. The other condition for detection problems was when two joints overlapped in the camera. At the above conditions, the therapist usually could adjust the positioning of the Kinect sensor or the angle of inclination of the sensor to solve the problem.
Originally, we used auditory and text cues to remind the children that they had improper movement patterns, however, this was not effective. The children either ignored the reminder or became angry. We disabled the auditory and text cues in the later courses of training, and the therapist reminded children who had improper movement patterns verbally. For some children, the therapist needed to do hands-on correction for improper movement patterns.
Efficacy
After intervention, the children had significant improvement in total QUEST score (median score preintervention 67.65, postintervention 75.84, Pâ<â0.01), particularly in domains of dissociated movements (preintervention 76.56, postintervention 82.81, Pâ<â0.01) and weight bearing (preintervention 88, postintervention 100, Pâ<â0.01). There was significant improvement in MA2 (preintervention 52.31â±â21.64, postintervention 58.85â±â15.33, Pâ=â0.02), the improvement mainly came from range motion (preintervention 16.77â±â5.86, postintervention 18.54â±â4.52, Pâ=â0.05) and fluency (preintervention 9.85â±â5.00, postintervention 11.54â±â4.26, Pâ=â0.01). There was no significant improvement in BBT (preintervention 12.31â±â8.29, postintervention 13.85â±â8.37, Pâ=â0.07) and ABILHAND-kids score (logits preintervention 1.35â±â1.90, postintervention 1.89â±â2.31, Pâ=â0.30) (Table 3).
Table 3.Outcome Measures at Baseline and Postintervention
Preintervention | Postintervention | ||
---|---|---|---|
Outcome measures | Meanâ±âSD or median (IQR) | Meanâ±âSD or median (IQR) | P |
QUEST | |||
âTotal score | 67.65 (56.57â82.54) | 75.84 (67.15â86.78) | <0.01 |
âDissociated movement | 76.56 (66.41â82.03) | 82.81 (69.53â88.29) | <0.01 |
âGrasp | 45.59â±â22.34 | 51.28â±â20.28 | 0.06 |
âWeight bearing | 88 (74â98) | 100 (87â100) | <0.01 |
âProtective UL extension | 64.74â±â24.75 | 70.94â±â25.97 | 0.08 |
Box and Block Test (number) | 12.31â±â8.29 | 13.85â±â8.37 | 0.07 |
MA2 | |||
âTotal score | 52.31â±â21.64 | 58.85â±â15.33 | 0.02 |
âROM | 16.77â±â5.86 | 18.62â±â4.52 | 0.05 |
âAccuracy | 18 (10.5â22) | 19 (16â22.5) | 0.09 |
âDexterity | 9.23â±â5.02 | 9.92â±â3.8 | 0.24 |
âFluency | 9.85â±â5 | 11.54â±â4.26 | 0.01 |
ABILHAND-kids (Logits) | 1.35â±â1.9 | 1.89â±â2.31 | 0.30 |
Non-normally distributed data reported as median and IQR, and normally distributed data reported as meanâ±âSD.
IQR, interquartile range; MA2, Melbourne Assessment 2; QUEST, Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test; ROM, range of motion; UL, upper limb.
Discussion
Our study showed that 24 sessions of Kinect2Scratch videogames training for UE function in children with CP were feasible, and might be effective.
Even though we proved the feasibility of Kinect2Scratch games, there were some technical problems to be considered. Error-prone systems resulted quickly in frustration, reduced motivation, and decreased compliance. We experienced some movement detection problems. Although the problems were usually solved by the supervised therapist, it is important to be aware of the detection problems, especially for short stature children in a seated position. The second problem was that we used auditory and text cues to remind the children when they had improper movement patterns, however, the effect was poor and even made the children angry. Therefore, we do not suggest such cue use in future game design.
An important issue for successfully delivering the interventions for children with CP is the motivation. In our study, children had great motivation to play the games at the early stage of intervention, but the three simple games were insufficient to maintain the children's interest for a long time. Burdea et al.28 also reported that children with CP quickly lost interest in playing videogames when the games were no longer a challenge and new games were not available. To address this issue, we should create more games and improve the game design and the quality of the graphics. In addition, we thought if children's family and/or friends were able to play with them in competitive or collaborative ways, this might delay or prevent the faded motivation. Moreover, using adequate rewards, such as bonus, at the end of the game could probably be helpful.
This was a proof-of-concept study; a noncontrolled group was essential to understand whether the proposed therapy could provide positive results in UE function. After intervention, the children had improvements in quality and function of gross UE movements, but not in the fine motor and ADL function. Our results were well in line with the findings of Zoccolillo.29 They found using the Xbox with Kinect controller could improve upper limb motor skills in children with CP (shown by QUEST), but the conventional therapy remained superior for improving performances in manual ADL (shown by ABILHAND-kids score). As we did a combination therapy (Kinect2Scratch combined with conventional therapies), we could not identify the intervention effect coming from Kinect2Scratch or conventional or both therapies. However, the context and requirement of training tasks might explain these improvements observed in this pilot study. In our design, the games were all controlled by shoulder motion combining with elbow extension. The conventional therapy focused on hand function. We suspected the improvements in gross upper limb movements might be due to the Kinect2Scratch game training. Our Kinect2Scratch games did not offer ADL and fine motor manipulation training, and therefore, it was unsurprising that changes in fine motor and ADL measures did not occur.
Levac et al.30 suggested nine potential active ingredients of interactive computer play interventions, which might help children with neuromotor impairments to improve their motor skills: (1) opportunities for practice, (2) task specificity, (3) flexibility to individualize treatment parameters, (4) feedback, (5) social play equalization, (6) neuroplastic changes, (7) problem-solving, (8) motivation, and (9) role of a support person. The Kinect2Scratch games offer highly repetitive task-specific training (the movements trained within the games are similar to real-world movements), allow for tailoring of the training parameters to individual needs and the progress of training, and provide visual and/or auditory feedback on task performance. Children need to do problem-solving repeatedly because of the unpredictability and provision of obstacles in games. During the games intervention, the supervised therapist provided verbal feedback that may have contributed to outcomes. We suggested the above features make the Kinect2Scratch games a potentially viable tool to train UE motor skills for children with CP. In future research projects, we should have a robust study design to assess the isolated effect of the Kinect2Scratch game training.
You et al.31 indicated that functional repetitive movements in virtual environments are one of the principal mechanisms to favor cortical reorganization and to elicit neuroplastic changes in children with CP. It was reported that the limb movements performed during videogame-based therapy were about three times greater than those performed during conventional therapy.29 The motion-controlled videogames training system thus offers an important step toward achieving the number of repetition of exercises, appearing necessary to drive neuroplastic changes.32 Even if there are benefits of repetitions of selected tasks, we still need to notice the risk of repetitive injury. Providing adequate rest during the training session and using variable movement patterns to play games could prevent repetitive injuries. Under such training principles, we did not find any persistent or severe soft tissue injury problems during our study period.
Limitation
Although this study is an important step on developing and evaluating the potential of Kinect2Scratch games as the UE rehabilitation treatment in children with CP, it has some limitations.
Since the study was designed as a proof-of-concept study in only 13 children without any control group, it is not possible to make any firm conclusions as to whether this way of training is more efficient in promoting functional benefits than other types of training. In addition, it was an adjunct study, the children also received conventional rehabilitation, a general conclusion cannot be extrapolated regarding the isolated efficacy of the gaming system. The limited number of games had affected motivation and probably limited the potential effectiveness. In the future, we should develop more games to increase the motivation and participation for children with CP to play the games. Because we used first generation of Kinect, we only could design games using shoulder and elbow for controlling. In the future, we should use the new generation of Kinect to design the interactive games with fine motor and virtual ADL training to increase the clinical application value.
Despite the above limitations, our study was important for proving the feasibility of clinical application of Kinect2Scratch games. Our results also could be a reference for future randomized controlled studies in larger populations of children to assess the true benefits of this gaming system.
Conclusions
Our study suggested that the Kinect2Scratch games may be feasible and acceptable by children with CP, but further research is required using larger samples before conclusions can be drawn.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a research grant from the Medical Research Center at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG8D0941. The authors thank the patients who participated in this study. They also thank Mr. Cheng-Chieh Wang and Yan-Siang Luo for helping game development.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Harris Cd Link Stl
References
Harris Cd Link Stl Manual Dexterity Test
- 1 . Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol2002; 44:633â640. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 . Evidence-based diagnosis, health care, and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol2014; 29:1141â1156. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 3 , . Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res2008; 51:S225âS239. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4 , , Intensive upper extremity training for children with hemiplegia: From science to practice. Semin Pediatr Neurol2013; 20:100â105. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5 , , Home based computer-assisted upper limb exercise for young children with cerebral palsy: A feasibility study investigating impact on motor control and functional outcome. J Rehabil Med2011; 43:359â363. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 6 , , Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature1995; 377:155â158. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 7 , , Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke2000; 31:1210â1216. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 , . Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011. Google Scholar
- 9 , , . Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic management of upper-limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics2009; 123:e1111âe1122. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10 , . The influence of virtual reality play on children's motivation. Can J Occup Ther2005; 72:21â29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11 , , Wii-habilitation of upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. An explorative study. Dev Neurorehabil2013; 16:44â51. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12 , , . Potential of the Nintendo Wii as a rehabilitation tool for children with cerebral palsy in a developing country: A pilot study. Physiotherapy2012; 98:238â242. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 , , . A Kinect-based upper limb rehabilitation system to assist people with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil2013; 34:3654â3659. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14 , , Scratch: A sneak preview [education]. In Creating, Connecting and Collaborating Through Computing, 2004. Proceedings. Second International Conference on. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC; 2004: pp. 104â109. Google Scholar
- 15 . Kinect2Scratch (Version 2.5) [Computer Software]. 2012. https://stephenhowell.github.io/kinect2scratch/Google Scholar
- 16 , , Clinical feasibility of interactive motion-controlled games for stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil2015; 12:63. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 17 , , Usability of videogame-based dexterity training in the early rehabilitation phase of stroke patients: A pilot study. Front Neurol2017; 8:654. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 18 , , The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: Reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85:380â384. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 19 , , Test-retest and inter- and intrareliability of the quality of the upper-extremity skills test in preschool-age children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2007; 88:1686â1689. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20 , , Reliability of the quality of upper extremity skills test for children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 12 years. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2012; 32:4â21. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21 , , . Box and Block test of manual dexterity: Norms for 6â19 year olds. Can J Occup Ther1985; 52:241â245. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 22 , , . The Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function: Test Administration Manual. Melbourne: Royal Children's Hospital; 1999. Google Scholar
- 23 , , ABILHAND-Kids: A measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology2004; 63:1045â1052. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 24 , , . Norm scores of the Box and Block test for children ages 3â10 years. Am J Occup Ther2013; 67:312â318. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 25 , , Reliability of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol2001; 43:761â767. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 26 , , . Upper limb activity measures for 5- to 16-year-old children with congenital hemiplegia: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol2010; 52:14â21. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 27 , , Assessing bimanual performance in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol2010; 52:413â421. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 28 , , Robotics and gaming to improve ankle strength, motor control, and function in children with cerebral palsyâA case study series. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2013; 21:165â173. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 29 , , Video-game based therapy performed by children with cerebral palsy: A cross-over randomized controlled trial and a cross-sectional quantitative measure of physical activity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2015; 51:669â676. Medline, Google Scholar
- 30 , , . Defining the active ingredients of interactive computer play interventions for children with neuromotor impairments: A scoping review. Res Dev Disabil2012; 33:214â223. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 31 , , Cortical reorganization induced by virtual reality therapy in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2005; 47:628â635. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 32 , , Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90:1692â1698. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
Harris Cd Link Stl Manual Dexterity
-
Information © Jen-Wen Hung et al., 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.Keywords Open access This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited -
Loading ..